Fee comparison

AJ Bell vs Trading 212

Compare AJ Bell and Trading 212 ISA fees side by side. See which is cheapest for your portfolio size and where the crossover point is.

Portfolio size
£50,000
£1k£500k
Account type
Investing in
💡
Annual cost across portfolio sizes
Your portfolio: £50,000

Fee table at key portfolio sizes (ISA · Funds)

Portfolio AJ Bell Trading 212 Cheaper

Monthly trading assumed. Verify fees at source before switching.

Features comparison

Feature AJ Bell Trading 212
Invests in Funds, Etfs, Shares, Investment_trusts, Bonds, Gilts Etfs, Shares
Stocks & Shares ISA
SIPP
GIA
Junior ISA
Flexible ISA
Fractional shares
Regular investing
Mobile app
FSCS protected
Founded 1995 2004

Verdict

Choose AJ Bell if…

Investors who want full platform breadth at lower cost than Hargreaves Lansdown. The £42/yr ISA cap on ETFs and shares makes it especially competitive for portfolios above £17,000 investing in ETFs or stocks.

Choose Trading 212 if…

Active traders and ETF investors who want zero fees and a flexible ISA (so you can withdraw and re-invest within the same tax year). Note there is no SIPP, so not suitable as a standalone pension platform.

Use the calculator above to find the cheapest option for your specific portfolio size and investing style.

Open AJ Bell → Open Trading 212 →

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings based on fees only.

Related comparisons

AJ Bell vs Fidelity Trading 212 vs FidelityAJ Bell vs Freetrade Trading 212 vs FreetradeAJ Bell vs Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212 vs Hargreaves LansdownAJ Bell vs Interactive Investor Trading 212 vs Interactive InvestorAJ Bell vs InvestEngine Trading 212 vs InvestEngineAJ Bell vs Vanguard Trading 212 vs Vanguard