Fee comparison

Fidelity vs Trading 212

Compare Fidelity and Trading 212 ISA fees side by side. See which is cheapest for your portfolio size and where the crossover point is.

Portfolio size
£50,000
£1k£500k
Account type
Investing in
💡
Annual cost across portfolio sizes
Your portfolio: £50,000

Fee table at key portfolio sizes (ISA · Funds)

Portfolio Fidelity Trading 212 Cheaper

Monthly trading assumed. Verify fees at source before switching.

Features comparison

Feature Fidelity Trading 212
Invests in Funds, Etfs, Shares, Investment_trusts Etfs, Shares
Stocks & Shares ISA
SIPP
GIA
Junior ISA
Flexible ISA
Fractional shares
Regular investing
Mobile app
FSCS protected
Founded 1969 2004

Verdict

Choose Fidelity if…

Fund investors who want a broad range of active and passive funds with no dealing charge. Fidelity's 0.35% rate is cheaper than HL for funds, and it offers a junior ISA for families.

Choose Trading 212 if…

Active traders and ETF investors who want zero fees and a flexible ISA (so you can withdraw and re-invest within the same tax year). Note there is no SIPP, so not suitable as a standalone pension platform.

Use the calculator above to find the cheapest option for your specific portfolio size and investing style.

Open Fidelity → Open Trading 212 →

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings based on fees only.

Related comparisons

Fidelity vs AJ Bell Trading 212 vs AJ BellFidelity vs Freetrade Trading 212 vs FreetradeFidelity vs Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212 vs Hargreaves LansdownFidelity vs Interactive Investor Trading 212 vs Interactive InvestorFidelity vs InvestEngine Trading 212 vs InvestEngineFidelity vs Vanguard Trading 212 vs Vanguard