Fee comparison

Freetrade vs Trading 212

Compare Freetrade and Trading 212 ISA fees side by side. See which is cheapest for your portfolio size and where the crossover point is.

Portfolio size
£50,000
£1k£500k
Account type
Investing in
💡
Annual cost across portfolio sizes
Your portfolio: £50,000

Fee table at key portfolio sizes (ISA · Funds)

Portfolio Freetrade Trading 212 Cheaper

Monthly trading assumed. Verify fees at source before switching.

Features comparison

Feature Freetrade Trading 212
Invests in Etfs, Shares Etfs, Shares
Stocks & Shares ISA
SIPP
GIA
Flexible ISA
Fractional shares
Regular investing
Mobile app
FSCS protected
Founded 2016 2004

Verdict

Choose Freetrade if…

Smaller-portfolio investors (under ~£20,000) who prefer paying a predictable flat fee of £71.88/yr for their ISA. Also suits those who want commission-free trading in a clean mobile-first experience.

Choose Trading 212 if…

Active traders and ETF investors who want zero fees and a flexible ISA (so you can withdraw and re-invest within the same tax year). Note there is no SIPP, so not suitable as a standalone pension platform.

Use the calculator above to find the cheapest option for your specific portfolio size and investing style.

Open Freetrade → Open Trading 212 →

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings based on fees only.

Related comparisons

Freetrade vs AJ Bell Trading 212 vs AJ BellFreetrade vs Fidelity Trading 212 vs FidelityFreetrade vs Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212 vs Hargreaves LansdownFreetrade vs Interactive Investor Trading 212 vs Interactive InvestorFreetrade vs InvestEngine Trading 212 vs InvestEngineFreetrade vs Vanguard Trading 212 vs Vanguard