Fee comparison

Hargreaves Lansdown vs Trading 212

Compare Hargreaves Lansdown and Trading 212 ISA fees side by side. See which is cheapest for your portfolio size and where the crossover point is.

Portfolio size
£50,000
£1k£500k
Account type
Investing in
💡
Annual cost across portfolio sizes
Your portfolio: £50,000

Fee table at key portfolio sizes (ISA · Funds)

Portfolio Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212 Cheaper

Monthly trading assumed. Verify fees at source before switching.

Features comparison

Feature Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212
Invests in Funds, Etfs, Shares, Investment_trusts, Bonds, Gilts Etfs, Shares
Stocks & Shares ISA
SIPP
GIA
Lifetime ISA
Junior ISA
Flexible ISA
Fractional shares
Regular investing
Mobile app
FSCS protected
Founded 1981 2004
Assets under admin £172bn

Verdict

Choose Hargreaves Lansdown if…

Investors who want the widest choice of funds, shares, and investment trusts — including access to active funds with no dealing charge. Also suits those who value HL's research tools and customer service track record.

Choose Trading 212 if…

Active traders and ETF investors who want zero fees and a flexible ISA (so you can withdraw and re-invest within the same tax year). Note there is no SIPP, so not suitable as a standalone pension platform.

Use the calculator above to find the cheapest option for your specific portfolio size and investing style.

Open Hargreaves Lansdown → Open Trading 212 →

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings based on fees only.

Related comparisons

Hargreaves Lansdown vs AJ Bell Trading 212 vs AJ BellHargreaves Lansdown vs Fidelity Trading 212 vs FidelityHargreaves Lansdown vs Freetrade Trading 212 vs FreetradeHargreaves Lansdown vs Interactive Investor Trading 212 vs Interactive InvestorHargreaves Lansdown vs InvestEngine Trading 212 vs InvestEngineHargreaves Lansdown vs Vanguard Trading 212 vs Vanguard