Fee comparison

InvestEngine vs Trading 212

Compare InvestEngine and Trading 212 ISA fees side by side. See which is cheapest for your portfolio size and where the crossover point is.

Portfolio size
£50,000
£1k£500k
Account type
Investing in
💡
Annual cost across portfolio sizes
Your portfolio: £50,000

Fee table at key portfolio sizes (ISA · Funds)

Portfolio InvestEngine Trading 212 Cheaper

Monthly trading assumed. Verify fees at source before switching.

Features comparison

Feature InvestEngine Trading 212
Invests in Etfs Etfs, Shares
Stocks & Shares ISA
SIPP
GIA
Flexible ISA
Fractional shares
Regular investing
Mobile app
FSCS protected
Founded 2019 2004

Verdict

Choose InvestEngine if…

Passive investors who want to build a low-cost ETF portfolio and never pay a platform fee. Ideal if you're happy with index funds and ETFs and don't need access to active funds or individual shares.

Choose Trading 212 if…

Active traders and ETF investors who want zero fees and a flexible ISA (so you can withdraw and re-invest within the same tax year). Note there is no SIPP, so not suitable as a standalone pension platform.

Use the calculator above to find the cheapest option for your specific portfolio size and investing style.

Open InvestEngine → Open Trading 212 →

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Rankings based on fees only.

Related comparisons

InvestEngine vs AJ Bell Trading 212 vs AJ BellInvestEngine vs Fidelity Trading 212 vs FidelityInvestEngine vs Freetrade Trading 212 vs FreetradeInvestEngine vs Hargreaves Lansdown Trading 212 vs Hargreaves LansdownInvestEngine vs Interactive Investor Trading 212 vs Interactive InvestorInvestEngine vs Vanguard Trading 212 vs Vanguard